Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2001No. S082236Published

1Dissent

BAXTER, J., Dissenting.

The Medicare Act (42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq.) (hereafter sometimes referred to as Medicare or the Act) is a massive federally insured program that covers health services for the elderly and disabled. Congress has decreed that any enrollee of a Medicare health maintenance organization (HMO) plan who wishes to challenge the HMO’s denial of health services under Medicare must do so through Medicare’s administrative review process; if that process yields a final decision that is adverse to the enrollee, then judicial review must be sought in federal court. (42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. MIDLAND PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API