State v. Rolling
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Plymouth District Court. — C. C. Bradley, Judge. The defendant was convicted of the crime of seduction, and appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
* Faville, J.
1. Seduction: limitation of actions: jury question. — I. The indictment in this case was returned by the grand jury of Plymouth County on March 27, 1919, charging the defendant with having committed the crime of seduction on or about October 1, 1917. The cause was tried, in September, 1919.
One of appellant’s main contentions is that the State failed to establish the fact that the alleged seduction was committed within 18 months before the indictment was returned. The prosecuting witness and the defendant had lived in the same vicinity for many years, and had been acquainted since…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. PrizerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- State v. HamannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. HigdonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- State v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. EppsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- State v. WollertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924