Legal Opinion

United States v. Cannel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2008No. 06-30590PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge SCHWARZER; Concurrence by Judge CLIFTON.

SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge:

James N. Cannel appeals the sentence of 72 months’ imprisonment for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). On this appeal, Cannel 1912 contends for the first time that the government breached the plea agreement. We review for plain error and find that the government did not breach the plea agreement with Cannel. We therefore affirm the sentence.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In January 2005, Cannel began chatting online under the username “surehing” with a Seattle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Miguel Angel Flores-PayonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Juan Espinoza-CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. WaknineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. State v. Miller.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  4. United States v. Ubaldo Gonzalez-AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Willie MickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API