Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Utah

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 17, 1999No. 981246-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINS, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Utah (Blue Cross) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 In October 1985, Gerald McCoy purchased a health insurance policy known as the Qualifier I plan (the plan) from Blue Cross. Under the terms of the plan, Blue Cross reserved “the absolute right to modify or amend this [ajgreement from time to time provided, however, that no such modification or amendment shall be effective until thirty (30) days after written notice thereof has been given to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bantz v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Majernicek v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Cade v. Zions First National BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  4. Reed v. Davis County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. Diamond T. Utah, Inc. v. Canal Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. McCoy v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Barclay v. iFit Health & Fitness Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  4. Cascade Collections v. CorrayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API