Legal Opinion

State v. Isham

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1975No. State 162 (1974)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

One-half hour after the commission of a rape, the defendant, who fit the description of the rapist given by the victim, was found walking with untied shoes two and one-half blocks from the scene of the crime. He was taken to the home where the rape occurred for a confrontation with the victim of the crime for identification purposes. The victim of the rape identified the defendant as the rapist, first by hearing his voice, then by observing his person. Several challenges are made to the procedure followed and each such challenge will be separately reviewed.

One-to-one. We have here an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  2. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. Hampton v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. WolvertonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API