Hughes v. Insley
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
SALMON, J.
Central to the resolution of the issues presented in this appeal is the application of the doctrine of claim preclusion.
The doctrine of res judicata (also called direct estoppel or claim preclusion) applies when the parties to a subsequent suit are the same or in privity with the parties to a prior suit; the first and second suits present the same claim or cause of action; and there was a final judgment rendered on the merits in the first suit, by a court of competent jurisdiction. When those three elements are satisfied, the first claim is merged into…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alvey v. AlveyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Kent County Board of Education v. BilbroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Columbian Carbon Co. v. KightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Rosencrantz v. Shields, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. BursonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Monarc Construction, Inc. v. Aris Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Kaye v. Wilson-GaskinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.