Legal Opinion
Buono Sales, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 25, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 170-62PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGELLI, District Judge.
This action was tried to the Court, sitting without a jury, on the issues of liability under the first and fourth counts of the complaint, which allege, respectively, breach of contract, and tortious interference with business and prospective economic advantage. Counts two, three and five have- been abandoned; and it has been stipulated that if the Court should make a finding of no liability on count one of the complaint, the remaining count six, based on the Automobile Dealers’ Day in Court Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1221 et seq., would also be abandoned.
Plaintiff Buono…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Harrington v. Inter-State Business Men's Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Fidelity Trust Company v. American Surety Company of New York and Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Van Horn v. Van HornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Efs Marketing, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Russ Berrie & Company, Inc., and Russell Berrie, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Saul v. Midlantic Nat. Bank/SouthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Buono Sales, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Buono Sales, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966