Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. Van Horn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 29 opinions

On error.

1Opinion of the Court

*319The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J,

This suit was instituted by Emma Van Horn and her husband against Amos- H. Van Horn and Casper Soer. The action is in tort, and the declaration, among other things, charges that the defendants conspired to injure Emma in her business of selling fancy goods, which she carried on in her own name, and that, by false and malicious statements concerning the personal and business character of Emma, they induced and persuaded one Snyder to remove the stock of goods he had supplied her with, and to refuse to deliver what he had expected to let…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Kimball v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. Van Horn v. Van HornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  4. Austin v. BarrowsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  5. Thomas v. RumseyNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lamorte Burns & Co., Inc. v. WaltersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  4. Moran v. DunphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. National Park Bank v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API