Merritt v. Merritt
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The question presented by this appeal is whether or not the trial court should have denied a motion to modify a previous order for alimony and support of a minor child in a divorce case. Certain accrued allowances for such purpose were not paid, and the court below further found that the only income of defendant was his monthly salary, which was less than the amount of the monthly allowance, and that he had no other property or assets or credit facilities except the possibility of borrowing from relatives or others.
We are of the view that the order appealed from should be reversed,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Craig v. CraigIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Boyden v. BoydenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
- Merritt v. MerrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Tompkins v. TompkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Whitney v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Cogswell v. CogswellOregon Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.