Legal Opinion

Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Strong

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 17, 1990No. 11668-5-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

Puget Sound Power and Light Company (Puget) appeals an order of summary judgment in favor of Gerald Strong which limited the damages Puget could recover for a utility pole destroyed by Strong. We affirm.

Strong negligently drove his automobile into one of Puget's utility poles and destroyed it. Puget, thereafter, *432instituted a suit against Strong seeking damages for the cost of the replacement pole plus the cost of labor and overhead expenses incident to its replacement. Strong answered and admitted liability for the labor and overhead expenses incurred by Puget in replacing the pole but…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Mieske v. Bartell Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Davis v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Puget Sound Power and Light Co. v. StrongWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. TaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API