Portland General Electric Co. v. Taber
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Plaintiff Portland General Electric (PGE) appeals, assigning error to the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Taber and intervenor Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon. The sole issue presented is whether the proper measure of damages when a motorist negligently destroys a wooden power pole is: (a) the undepreciated cost of the lost pole or (b) the full replacement cost of a new pole. The trial court determined that, as a matter of law, PGE’s recovery was limited to the lost pole’s undepreciated value. We affirm.
The material facts are undisputed. PGE owns and operates an electrical…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- New Jersey Power & Light Co. v. MabeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Central Illinois Light Co. v. StenzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- Carolina Power & Light Company v. PaulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. De VerteuilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020