Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Annal Management Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 9, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lucindo Suarez, J.

The issue in this small claim is whether this court can hold a party in contempt consistent with procedural and substantive due process for failure to respond to a judicial subpoena, actually received, containing caption and service deficiencies, where the previous underlying claim against it was dismissed. This court holds that the defects in the form and service of the subpoena are not sufficiently fatal to void this court’s jurisdiction to do substantial justice.

*289Plaintiff, Beatrice Hampton (Hampton), moved by order to show cause for an order to hold…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fashion Page, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Matter of DepueNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Doors v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Cohen v. BanksJustice Court of Village of South Nyack · 1994
  5. State Commission for Human Rights v. MarranoNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Katims v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Suffolk County District Court · 2005
  2. Peter v. Massapequa Water DistrictNassau County District Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API