Legal Opinion

State Commission for Human Rights v. Marrano

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew J. Jasen, J.

Motion to compel Marrano Construction Company, Inc., a witness, to comply with a subpoena duces tecum to produce 'before Lloyd L. Hurst, the Investigating Commissioner of the New York State Commission for Human Bights, certain contracts and records in conjunction with an investigation being conducted by the said Commissioner as to alleged discriminatory practices by the -Continental Bealty Company.

In opposing this application, the witness raises a technical objection to the service of the subpoena- because the fees paid were not in accordance with CPLR 8001 (subds. [a], [b]).

Under the facts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of DepueNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. People v. DeValdorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Schwartz v. ShapiroNew York Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Annal Management Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1994
  2. Osborne v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In re the Estate of DertingerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API