Legal Opinion

Katims v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Suffolk County District Court

Decided July 18, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Stephen Hackeling, J.

Sanford Katims, the above-captioned plaintiff, filed a complaint dated November 11, 2004 against DaimlerChrysler Motors Company, and its dealer/franchise/agent, codefendant Huntington Jeep Chrysler, Inc. The plaintiff is seeking to recover $4,264.53 for an alleged breach of a written warranty as well as alleging a violation of 15 USC § 2303. Huntington Jeep has appeared and was defended by counsel and a corporate officer and has advised the court that Chrysler is aware of the action but will not appear as it contends that this court lacks…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Fashion Page, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
Mencher v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
Barrett v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
Keskal v. ModrakowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
Hall v. Everett Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Goins-Tisdale v. GEICORochester City Court · 2017