Legal Opinion
Choquette v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 19, 2012No. Nos. 10 Civ. 6485 (JGK), 11 Civ. 789 (JGK), 11 Civ. 786 (JGK), 11 Civ. 787 (JGK), 10 Civ. 5781 (JGK), 11 Civ. 788 (JGK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The plaintiffs, Catherine Choquette, Clarissa Goldsmith, Vanessa Giamalakis, Annette Powell, Lesline Colden, Dakota Duncan, and Alicia Robinson (“the plaintiffs”) bring seven individual actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 asserting violations of their rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Their claims arise from an alleged policy, practice and custom of the New York City Department of Correction (“DOC”) of subjecting female detainees to a forced gynecological examination (“gynecological exam”) upon…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matana v. MerkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Vincent v. Money StoreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Vincent v. Money StoreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- National Convention Services, L.L.C. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.