Legal Opinion

Cameron v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2007No. S-11975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Neil Cameron, who was accused of committing a felony, asked the district attorney's office to inform the grand jury that he wished to testify before it. The prosecutor in charge of Cameron's case declined to do so and Cameron was indicted. The superior court dismissed the indictment but the court of appeals reinstated it. We are now asked to decide if a prosecutor, who has been informed of a potential defendant's desire to testify before the grand jury, must inform the grand jury of that request. We conclude that the Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Iyapana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  2. Wassillie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Pastos v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. TEGOSEAK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API