Legal Opinion

TEGOSEAK v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 11, 2009No. A-10074PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Frank Moses Tego-seak was convicted of felony driving under the influence and driving with a suspended license.1 Both the grand jury that indicted Tegoseak and the trial jury that convicted him heard the testimony of Robert Maestas, a private citizen who observed a Ford Bronco being driven in an obviously impaired manner, and who later identified Tegoseak from a photographic lineup as having driven the Bronco.

In pre-trial motions, Tegoseak argued that the photographic lineup was conducted in an unduly suggestive manner and that the superior…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2014
  4. Arthur J. Augustine v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2020
  5. State of Iowa v. Tony E. DoolinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API