TEGOSEAK v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Frank Moses Tego-seak was convicted of felony driving under the influence and driving with a suspended license.1 Both the grand jury that indicted Tegoseak and the trial jury that convicted him heard the testimony of Robert Maestas, a private citizen who observed a Ford Bronco being driven in an obviously impaired manner, and who later identified Tegoseak from a photographic lineup as having driven the Bronco.
In pre-trial motions, Tegoseak argued that the photographic lineup was conducted in an unduly suggestive manner and that the superior…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2014
- Arthur J. Augustine v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2020
- State of Iowa v. Tony E. DoolinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.