Legal Opinion

Krenov v. West Coast Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1956No. 33330PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This action involves a dispute between an insured and his insurer regarding the latter’s obligation to pay the proceeds of a policy in silver. The significant facts, as found by the trial court, are as follows:

On March 24, 1933, the respondent, then a resident of Shanghai, China, purchased from the appellant through its office located in the International Settlement of Shanghai, a twenty-year endowment policy of life insurance, which bore on its face a stamped and typed endorsement reading:

“The premiums and the benefits payable hereunder shall be paid in Shanghai (China) local currency of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Beaulaurier v. Washington State Hop Producers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Peplinski v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Cary-Davis Towing Co. v. SpradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bombardi v. Pochel's Appliance & TV Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  3. Bonanza Real Estate, Inc. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Moore v. DarkWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Shanghai Power Co. v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API