Legal Opinion

Bombardi v. Pochel's Appliance & TV Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 16, 1973No. 831-2PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Mrs. Bombardi, for damages to her rental property, and in favor of plaintiffs Messina for personal injuries and property loss, all of which were sustained as a result of a fire occurring in a duplex owned by Mrs. Bombardi and being occupied by her niece, Julia Messina and her husband, Tony Messina.

It was the contention of plaintiffs at trial that the cause of the fire and of the consequent damage to plaintiffs was a defect in a television set manufactured by defendant Admiral Corporation and sold to plaintiff, Mrs. Bombardi, as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cassisi v. Maytag Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Gammon v. Clark Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ford Motor Company v. MatthewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Winters v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Cornell Drilling Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API