Legal Opinion

McTague v. Sea Isle City Lot & Building Ass'n No. 3

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*428The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The contract between the plaintiff and defendant is contained in the printed rules of the latter. Under the special agreement thus arising the plaintiff had paid to the defendant the sum of money for which judgment was given in his favor in the court below. The defendant was an association, its general scheme being that each subscriber who had made thirty-six successive monthly payments of $10 each should be entitled to a lot of land-to be selected in accordance with the rules of the association. The plaintiff’s case, stated generally, is…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. NorcrossNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
  2. Luce v. New Orange Industrial Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  3. Cramer v. MooneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
  4. Chess v. VockrothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. Zimmerman v. BranyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API