Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Stiffler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 21, 1948No. [No. 73, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.

This is the second case in this court, and at least the third in the lower court, between appellees Llewellyn and England and Queen City Dairy, Inc., or one or more of its stockholders. In Llewellyn v. Queen City Dairy, 187 Md. 49, 48 A. 2d 322, we sustained a demurrer to a bill, and dismissed the bill, of Queen City and two of its stockholders against Llewellyn and England to enjoin any transfer of shares covered by options alleged to have been obtained from other stockholders (presumably including the present appellant) by fraud. The bill was dismissed for the reason, among others, that a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Linz v. SchuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. . Continental Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Northern Central Railway Co. v. WalworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Potter v. Bethesda Fire Department, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Foster-Porter Enterprises, Inc. v. De MareCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Stamatiades v. Merit Music Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. Massachusetts Indemnity & Life Insurance v. DresserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Berger v. BurkoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API