Legal Opinion
Georgia Peanut Co. v. Famo Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1938No. 8694PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment against it in a jury waived proceeding. It sued upon an alleged contract for the sale of certain peanuts to the appellees-defendants’ predecessor in interest. Appellant claimed that the contract was made through a broker by virtue of a memorandum of sale of the peanuts, signed by the broker, it was claimed, as representative of both parties.
The appellees, defendants below, were successor in interest to the claimed buyer. They contended that there was no meeting of minds on the contract and that the alleged broker was in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Byrd v. PihaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Brandon v. PritchettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Brooke & Co. v. Cunningham Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Metzler v. O. J. Barnes Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Albert H. And Doris G. Throndson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Albert H. And Doris G. Throndson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, J. Leonard Schmitz and Alice Schmitz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. BonziCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Hunt Foods, Inc., a Corporation v. Wellington Phillips and H. W. LiholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Albert H. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. BonziCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964