Brooke & Co. v. Cunningham Bros.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from municipal court of Atlanta. April 18, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.
1. The refusal to strike an answer on motion, or the overruling of a demurrer, can not properly be assigned as error in a motion for a new trial. Willbanks v. Untriner, 98 Ga. 801 (25 S. E. 841) ; Mitchell v. Masury, 132 Ga. 360 (9), 361 (64 S. E. 275) ; Eldorado Jewelry Co. v. Hitchcock, 136 Ga. 22 (70 S. E. 658) ; Kelly v. Malone, 5 Ga. App. 618 (63 S. E. 639); Rodgers v. Hill-Williamson Co., 11 Ga. App. 133 (74 S. E. 899). There being no appropriate exception to the overruling of the demurrer to the answer, the question of the correctness of the court’s ruling in this particular is not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- North & Co. v. Mendel & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Lester v. HeidtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Willbanks v. UntrinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Landrum v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mendel v. Converse & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Harris v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- West Lumber Co. v. SchnuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Butler v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Glisson v. BurkhalterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.