Sorrentino v. McNeill
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
Appellant’s brief thus summarizes the controlling question in this cause: “The main proposition on this appeal is whether a child under 7 years of age can under any circumstances be guilty of contributory negligence. • The jury found John Sorrentino, Jr., who at the time of the collision was 6 years of age, guilty of contributory negligence. Under Article 2211, as amended in 1931 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. .2211], plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, urging as a ground therefor that a child under the age of 7 years, as a matter of law, cannot be held…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- McDermott v. SevereSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McWhirterTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Maskaliunas v. C. W. I. R. R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RodgersTexas Supreme Court · 1896
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Yarborough v. BernerTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Ligon v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Enget Ex Rel. Enget v. NeffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.