Legal Opinion

Sorrentino v. McNeill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1938No. 10649PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

Appellant’s brief thus summarizes the controlling question in this cause: “The main proposition on this appeal is whether a child under 7 years of age can under any circumstances be guilty of contributory negligence. • The jury found John Sorrentino, Jr., who at the time of the collision was 6 years of age, guilty of contributory negligence. Under Article 2211, as amended in 1931 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. .2211], plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, urging as a ground therefor that a child under the age of 7 years, as a matter of law, cannot be held…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. McDermott v. SevereSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McWhirterTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Maskaliunas v. C. W. I. R. R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RodgersTexas Supreme Court · 1896

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Yarborough v. BernerTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ligon v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Enget Ex Rel. Enget v. NeffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API