State v. Butterworth
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Miller, C. J.:
Hypnotically refreshed testimony of the defendant, William T. Butterworth, was admitted by the trial court over the State’s objection during Butterworth’s trial on three counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony theft. The jury returned a verdict of acquittal. The State reserved the question of the propriety of the admission of Butterworth’s testimony and appeals. K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(3). We deny the State’s appeal.
The sole question before us is whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence defendant Butterworth’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Ralph PetrozzielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. WardenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Burral v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. L.K.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Burral v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.