Legal Opinion

State v. Butterworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 25, 1990No. 62,810PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, C. J.:

Hypnotically refreshed testimony of the defendant, William T. Butterworth, was admitted by the trial court over the State’s objection during Butterworth’s trial on three counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony theft. The jury returned a verdict of acquittal. The State reserved the question of the propriety of the admission of Butterworth’s testimony and appeals. K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(3). We deny the State’s appeal.

The sole question before us is whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence defendant Butterworth’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Ralph PetrozzielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. State v. WardenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Burral v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. State v. L.K.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Burral v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API