Legal Opinion
NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. E. RUTHERFORD
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 13, 1975PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
137 N.J. Super. 271 (1975)
348 A.2d 825
NEW JERSEY SPORTS AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided November 13, 1975.
Mr. William J. Ward for plaintiff.
Mr. Alfred A. Porro, Jr. for defendant Borough of East Rutherford.
Mr. Frederick M. Testa for defendants Daido and Steelcraft.
Mr. Robert Tobin for defendant Vicente Puig & Co.
Mr. Ronald J. Picinich for defendant Knickerbocker Development Corp. (Messrs. Picinich & Rigolosi, attorneys).
Mr. Allan Klinger for defendant Royal Worcester (Messrs. Cuccio,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Washington Market Enterprises, Inc. v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Airwick Industries, Inc. v. Carlstadt Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- State v. HudesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Atlantic City v. Cynwyd InvestmentsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Heir v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Exxon Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Authority of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Hess Realty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.