A.L. v. Eichman
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Nora Barry Fischer, United States District Judge
I. Introduction
Pending before the Court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of whether Defendant Adelaide L. Eichman, M.D., is a state actor under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Docket Nos. 57 and 59). For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that Dr. Eichman is not a state actor; therefore, Defendant's summary judgment motion will be granted and Plaintiffs' motion will be denied.
II. Background
This matter arises from allegations of child abuse made against Plaintiffs A.L. and S.W. Plaintiffs filed this action on March 22,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- GAJAROV v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIESDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Maria Alejandra Ramirez Rodriguez and Cristian Andres Guzman de la Ossa, individually and as next friends of their minor son, I.R. v. Nancy Sanders Harper; Hennepin County; Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., d/b/a Hennepin County Medical Center; The University of Minnesota Physicians, d/b/a U of M Physicians; and Megan DillmanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- U. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- VUYANICH v. SMITHTON BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- VUYANICH v. SMITHTON BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.