Legal Opinion

Hanners v. City of Ashland

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 20, 1959PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

■ The plaintiff’s son drowned while swimming in a reservoir maintained by defendant City of Ashland. In this suit for damages the trial court directed a verdict for defendant.

The basis of plaintiff’s claim is that the reservoir constituted an attractive nuisance, and the defendant negligently failed to guard or fence it.

This reservoir was a properly constructed concrete basin which was filled with water from a depth of 12 to 35 feet. There was no protective device immediately around the basin, although the reservoir area was enclosed by a barbed wire fence. It was shown…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schauf's Administrator v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Von Almen's Administrator v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Jarvis v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. Goss v. Shawnee Post No. 3204, V. F. W. of United States, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grimes v. HettingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  2. Mason v. City of Mt. SterlingKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Vargas Rodríguez v. Autoridad de las Fuentes FluvialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  4. Harris v. Cozatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API