Hanners v. City of Ashland
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Commissioner.
■ The plaintiff’s son drowned while swimming in a reservoir maintained by defendant City of Ashland. In this suit for damages the trial court directed a verdict for defendant.
The basis of plaintiff’s claim is that the reservoir constituted an attractive nuisance, and the defendant negligently failed to guard or fence it.
This reservoir was a properly constructed concrete basin which was filled with water from a depth of 12 to 35 feet. There was no protective device immediately around the basin, although the reservoir area was enclosed by a barbed wire fence. It was shown…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schauf's Administrator v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Von Almen's Administrator v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Jarvis v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Goss v. Shawnee Post No. 3204, V. F. W. of United States, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grimes v. HettingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Mason v. City of Mt. SterlingKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Vargas Rodríguez v. Autoridad de las Fuentes FluvialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Harris v. Cozatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.