Legal Opinion

Smith v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 1938No. 14675PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

These suits were brought by the respondents against appellant for a decree declaring in full force and effect two policies of insurance issued by appellant on the life of the re spondent Thomas H. Smith, and to prevent the enforcement of the lapse thereof on account of the non-payment of the premiums when due under an extension agreement. The respondent Daisy H. Smith is a party to the cause only by reason of being the beneficiary designated in the policies. Hereinafter, the word “respondent” will have reference to only Thomas H.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Cantey, Adm'r v. Phila. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McPherson v. J. E. Sirrine & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  2. Hungerpiller v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API