Schlarp v. Dern
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONTI, District Judge.
Introduction
This case concerns a police officer, plaintiff Erik Schlarp (“plaintiff’ or “Schlarp”), who contends that he was wrongfully denied a promotion in retaliation for his exercise of rights protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Paul Dern, Steve Taylor and Plum Borough (“defendants”). For the reasons that follow, that motion will be granted.
Background 1
Pennsylvania has a statutory process for filling vacancies which arise…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Mitchell v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Dice v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Steele v. BonnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- BYERS v. SOUTH CONNELLSVILLE BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.