Legal Opinion

Schlarp v. Dern

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 2009No. Civil Action 06-1089PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CONTI, District Judge.

Introduction

This case concerns a police officer, plaintiff Erik Schlarp (“plaintiff’ or “Schlarp”), who contends that he was wrongfully denied a promotion in retaliation for his exercise of rights protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Paul Dern, Steve Taylor and Plum Borough (“defendants”). For the reasons that follow, that motion will be granted.

Background 1

Pennsylvania has a statutory process for filling vacancies which arise…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Mitchell v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Dice v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Steele v. BonnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. BYERS v. SOUTH CONNELLSVILLE BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API