Legal Opinion
Steele v. Bonner
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 2010No. 25358PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] John Steele (Steele), as chairman of the Consumer Protection Committee of the State Bar of South Dakota, sought a permanent injunction enjoining Hazel Bonner (Bonner) from practicing law without a license. After a court trial, the court granted Steele’s permanent injunction, permanently enjoining Bonner from certain specified conduct relating to the practice of law.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Bonner is a 1994 graduate of the University of South Dakota School of Law. She has never successfully passed the South Dakota bar exam (or any other bar exam), nor has she been admitted to the practice of law by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wingate v. Gage County School Dist., No. 34Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- State v. DarbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Bakker v. IrvineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schultz v. ScandrettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Bonner v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Thompson v. HarrieDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018