Legal Opinion

Putman v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 11823PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J.—

The petitioner herein applies for a writ of prohibition having for its purpose that of preventing the respondent judge herein from proceeding further with the hearing and determination of a certain action pending in the court over which he presides, and also prohibiting the other respondents herein from proceeding further to carry out the provisions of a certain order made by said judge in said action in the matter of the appointment of a referee therein during an early stage in the trial of said action before said court. The case in question was entitled Sidney F. Brock v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Williams v. Benton.California Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Fox v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Fredendall v. ShraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Emery v. Guadalupe MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Munce v. MunceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kennedy v. ByrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Larson v. ThoresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Schefski v. AnkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API