Illinois v. Condon
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Justice White, with whom The Chief Justice joins,
dissenting.
The State of Illinois, petitioner here, seeks review of a judgment of the Illinois Supreme Court holding that a police search of respondent’s home, conducted pursuant to a warrant, was unconstitutional because the police failed to knock and announce their presence before entering the premises. Because the decision below is in conflict with those of other courts on the question of what showing police must make to dispense with the ordinary knock-and-announce requirement in executing search warrants, I would grant certiorari.
Based on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Phillip MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- People v. CondonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. Patrick Harm KeeneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MatosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992