Legal Opinion

Strowbridge v. Winkler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1955No. 36,498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

This action was brought by L. E. Strowbridge against Roy A. Winkler, doing business as Brainerd Realty Company, to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract on the part of defendant. Plaintiff claims that on or about September 29, 1950, he and defendant entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of certain residence property in the village of Baxter wherein defendant, as agent and broker of Mr. and Mrs. Quentin…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacoboski v. PraxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Stanger v. GordonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Sroga v. LundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API