Legal Opinion
Barrell v. Barrell
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 12, 1980No. [No. 99, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRodowsky, J.
The Maryland version of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act is Md. Code (1957, 1979 Repl. Vol.), Art. 89C (hereinafter "URESA”). Sections 31 through 39 inclusive of URESA comprise the subtitle, "Registration of Foreign Support Orders.” In Barrell v. Barrell, 43 Md. App. 298, 405 A.2d 324 (1979) the Court of Special Appeals held that the registration provisions of URESA were not the exclusive means of initiating in this state the enforcement of a foreign alimony decree. We granted certiorari to review that decision and shall affirm.
The Superior Court for the County of Clayton,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCabe v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Alig v. AligSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Zelek v. BrosseauNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Helgesson v. HelgessonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961
- Abb v. CrossfieldCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth of Virginia v. AutryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Osteoimplant Technology, Inc. v. Rathe Productions, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Holbrook v. CummingsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000