Legal Opinion

Osteoimplant Technology, Inc. v. Rathe Productions, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 6, 1995No. 848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. ALPERT, Judge,

Ret., Specially Assigned.

In this appeal we are called upon to decide whether a foreign judgment, when recorded in Maryland, is then subject to post judgment revision proceedings under the Maryland Rules.

All parties involved agree that appellant, Osteoimplant Technology Inc., hired appellee, Rathe Productions Inc., multiple times in the early 1990’s to build exhibits for the purpose of demonstrating appellant’s wares at trade shows. The parties further do not dispute that in December 1993 the parties expressly agreed that appellant had an outstanding debt to appellee for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Matter of HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Hancock National Bank v. FarnumSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Salmeri v. SalmeriWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mike Smith Pontiac, GMC, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Mike Smith Pontiac, GMC, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Oxendine v. SLM Capital Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Tropic Leisure Corp. v. HaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API