Legal Opinion

Zelek v. Brosseau

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 25, 1957PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 N.J. Super. 521 (1957)

136 A.2d 416

VIRGINIA (BROSSEAU) ZELEK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ORVILLE BROSSEAU, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 18, 1957.

Decided November 25, 1957.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Frank M. Lario argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. A. David Epstein argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Epstein & Fluharty, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendant appeals from a summary judgment entered in plaintiff's favor by the County Court in an action brought upon a Vermont…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stearns v. StearnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. City of Philadelphia v. StadlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Gonzalez v. GonzalezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Biles v. BilesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. In Re Estate of NeuwirthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API