Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Pippin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

' Appeal from the County Court of Eastland County. Tried below before Hon. E. A. Hill.

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Associate Justice.

This suit was by Jack Pippin against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company to recover the value of grass alleged to have been burned through the negligence of the defendant, and is a companion case to Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Wooldridge & Hamby, ante, 384 (126 S. W., 603). The charges given in the two cases were the same, and for the reasons stated in the other case the judgment in this is reversed and the cause remanded for another trial.

But the record in this contains one assignment of error not presented in the former case, which must be discussed. It is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wooldridge & HambyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Texas Mortgage Services Corporation, Debtor. Texas Mortgage Services Corporation v. Guadalupe Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Randals v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Luter v. IhnkenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Holloway v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Iowa Park Producing & Refining Co. v. Seaboard Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API