Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wooldridge & Hamby

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Eastland County. Tried below before Hon. E. A. Hill.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Associate Justice.

This is a grass burning case, prosecuted by appellees against appellant, in the County' Court of Eastland County, in which there was a recovery in the sum of one hundred dollars. In the course of his instructions to the jury, the trial court used the following language: “If, from the evidence, you believe that the defendant failed to equip its engines, from which the sparks escaped which caused the fire, with the most improved spark arresters in use, or that the employees of the defendant operating said engines were guilty of negligence in failing to use ordinary care…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Texas Central Railroad Company v. QuallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PippinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. BruneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API