Legal Opinion

Bird v. Central Manufacturers Mutual Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1941PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action upon a policy issued by the defendant to plaintiff, insuring an automobile against loss by collision or upset. The insured automobile belonged to the Salem Automobile Company for whom the plaintiff, who obtained the insurance, was sales manager. The car had been loaned to the plaintiff, who was about to take a trip to the East, on condition that he would have it fully insured and be personally liable for any injury or damage which it might sustain while in his possession.

In compliance with this agreement, the plaintiff called over the telephone one Gr. A. Coffey, an agent of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. City of Davenport v. Peoria Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Insurance Co. v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Lightbody v. North American InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  5. Michigan Pipe Co. v. Michigan Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Farmers Butter & Dairy Cooperative v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Kabban v. MacKinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Frontier Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State of Oregon v. BlackOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Treit v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API