Legal Opinion

State v. Mathis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Bartholomew Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The information in this case is as follows: “ State of Indiana v. John D. Mathis and Samuel Hege — In the Bartholomew Common Pleas: Jeptha D. New, prosecuting attor*278ney, &c., informs the Court that the defendants, on or about the 1st of September, 1862, owned a saw mill on Jackson street, in the town of Columbus, Bartholomew county, Indiana, which obstructed and hindered, and ever since hath continued to obstruct and hinder, the free passage of a public street of known notoriety, to-wit: Jackson street aforesaid, in the town, county and State aforesaid, in front of said saw mill, by piling…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Common Council v. CroasIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Conner v. President of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1819

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Strange v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. City of Indianapolis v. HigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API