Legal Opinion

Dishno v. Home Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFeitz, C. J.

It is undisputed on this appeal that damage caused by a fire on February 16, 1948, rendered plaintiffs’ building untenantable during the time required to put it in tenantable condition, and that for the loss of rent for that period they were to be indemnified under the policy in question if they complied with provisions therein. In the affidavits filed b)' plaintiffs in opposing defendant’s motion for sum mary judgment, there are stated the following facts, as to which there is presently no denial by defendant, to wit:

That commencing about the middle of June, 1948, and continuing at intervals…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Killips v. Putnam Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Hart v. Citizens' Insurance Co. of PittsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Frels v. Little Black Farmers' Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Fischer v. Harmony Town InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Insurance Co. Of North America v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 12, Texas County, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Kolbeck v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Berry v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API