Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Turlock

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 13, 2007No. 1:04-cr-05278PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (Doc. 224)

WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Prevailing Defendants, the City of Tur-lock and the Turlock City Council (collectively, “the City” or “Turlock”), move for an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Plaintiffs, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust (collectively, “Wal-Mart”), oppose the motion.

II. BACKGROUND

The factual background of this case has been discussed at length in several previous decisions. For the purposes of this motion, only a brief summary of facts, most of which where undisputed…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ruff v. County of KingsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. CTIA—the Wireless Association® v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Crane-McNab v. County of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Gengler v. United States ex rel. Department of Defense & NavyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  5. Ecological Rights Foundation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API