Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Turlock
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (Doc. 224)
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Prevailing Defendants, the City of Tur-lock and the Turlock City Council (collectively, “the City” or “Turlock”), move for an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Plaintiffs, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust (collectively, “Wal-Mart”), oppose the motion.
II. BACKGROUND
The factual background of this case has been discussed at length in several previous decisions. For the purposes of this motion, only a brief summary of facts, most of which where undisputed…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ruff v. County of KingsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- CTIA—the Wireless Association® v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Crane-McNab v. County of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Gengler v. United States ex rel. Department of Defense & NavyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.