People v. Mitchell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), dated April 9, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In establishing a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]), the People bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts supporting the determinations sought (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. PettigrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. FuhrtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. MiddlemissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. MercerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.