Legal Opinion

Lee v. Rice

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 2002No. COA01-1506PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Earl Rice (“Rice”) and his wife, Martha Rice (collectively, “defendants”), appeal from judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding them liable for injuries inflicted upon Sherry Lee (“plaintiff”) by a pit bull dog. Defendants also appeal an order of the trial court denying their motions for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. For the reasons set forth herein, we vacate the judgment of the trial court.

On 28 January 2000, plaintiff filed a complaint in Buncombe County Superior Court, alleging that a pit bull dog known as “Blockhead” had attacked…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Barber v. HochstrasserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  3. Sellers v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Hunt v. Hazen, Adm.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Joslyn Ex Rel. Joslyn v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tiber Holding Corp. v. DiLoretoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Mims v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  3. Mims v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API