Legal Opinion

Thomas F. Clardy v. Duke University, a Corporation, and R. Charman Carroll

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1962No. 8466PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

In this diversity action, Thomas F. Clardy charges that on and before April 1955 he was under the professional care of defendant Carroll, an employee of Duke University, and that he sustained permanent brain damage from electric shock and insulin shock therapy recommended and administered by Dr. Carroll at Duke University Hospital as treatment for a mental disorder. Clardy complains that “about August 1957” he discovered for the first time the damage to his brain.

The complaint was filed on July 22, 1960, and summons issued on August 24, 1960. Neither defendant filed an answer but each timely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. CarduffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lewis v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Summers v. Wallace HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Papastefan v. B & L Const. Co., Inc. of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Robert Czeremcha v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Breier v. Northern California Bowling Proprietors' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Ocean Breeze Festival Park, Inc. v. ReichDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API