Legal Opinion

Diamond Match Co. v. Oshkosh Match Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin

Decided October 1, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Two actions in equity by the Diamond Match Company against the Oshkosh Match Works and others for infringement of a certain patent. Heard on complainant’s motion for an order requiring, the production of certain drawings by the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

BEAMAN, District Judge.

The complainant is prosecuting two actions in equity against the defendants, alleging infringement in each case of certain letters patent, and the defendants answer in each, under oath, denying infringement. The complainant was proceeding with the taking of testimony before a notary acting as examiner pursuant to stipulation, and produced as a witness in its behalf William H. Wyman, who was superintendent and director of the Oshkosh Match Works, and inventor of the alleged infringing machinery used by the defendants. It is sufficient to state that this witness testifies…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
  2. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
  3. Coop v. Dr. Savage Physical Development Institute, Ltd.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
  4. Dobson v. GrahamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Johnson Steel Street-Rail Co. v. North Branch Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shimadzu v. Electric Storage Battery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Utah Radio Products Co. v. Delco Appliance Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1937
  3. Carlson v. MatthysseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API