Legal Opinion

Johnson Steel Street-Rail Co. v. North Branch Steel Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bur Rule for .Attachment of A. J. Moxham.

1Opinion of the CourtReeh, J.

The difference "between this rule and that in the case of John Fulton, (48 Fed. Rep. 191.) is that Mr. Moxham is the president of the plaintiff company, as well as the patentee named in the patent in suit, and the drawings and templates called lor by the subpoena dvees le-cum are those in the possession of Mr. Moxham, or of the plaintiff company. The general rule seems to he settled that a party to the suit, or the oflieer of a corporation party, may be subpoenaed to bring such documents as are material to the issue. In Murray v. Elston, 28 N. J. Eq. 212, it is said that a party to a suit can…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Boston v. State Nat. Bank of BostonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1868

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crocker-Wheeler Co. v. BullockU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1904
  2. Diamond Match Co. v. Oshkosh Match WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API