Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Matthysse

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 21, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Carlson and his assignee, Aircraft-Marine Products, Inc., co-plaintiffs, instituted this action against Matthysse and his assignee, Burndy Engineering Company, Inc. At issue is the patent-ability of certain electrical connectors. The corporate parties are competing manufacturers of such connectors. The individual litigants are inventors of the devices in question who respectively assigned their rights to the corporate parties. Plaintiffs by this action seek an adjudication that Carlson and not Matthysse was the prior inventor of the subject matter in question.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
  2. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
  3. Rowell v. William Koehl Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1912
  4. Diamond Match Co. v. Oshkosh Match WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1894
  5. Utah Radio Products Co. v. Delco Appliance Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API