Legal Opinion

EpicentRx, Inc. v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 2023No. D081670MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/10/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EPICENTRx, INC. et al. D081670 Petitioners, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022- 00015228) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION Respondent; AND DENYING REHEARING EPIRx, L.P., NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT Real Party in Interest. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 21, 2023, be modified as follows: 1. On page 16, footnote 7, is modified to read as follows: 7. In the proceedings below, the defendants argued…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. America Online, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API